Major labels v. Suno and Udio

The core question is whether the use of copyrighted songs to train AI models constitutes copyright infringement or falls under fair use. The major labels argue that the AI companies have copied hundreds of songs to create music that competes with human artists, while Suno and Udio claim their use is transformative. This dispute is central to the case, as it will determine the legality of AI training practices. [14], [17], [20]

The lawsuits filed against Suno and Udio in different jurisdictions raise questions about jurisdictional authority and the applicability of international copyright law. The major labels filed their case against Suno in Massachusetts and against Udio in New York, which may complicate enforcement and legal strategy. [20], [18]

The economic implications of the lawsuits could reshape the business model for AI music generators. The major labels are seeking $150,000 in damages, which raises questions about how AI companies will need to adjust their licensing agreements and operational costs to comply with copyright laws. [14], [15]

The potential for tortious interference claims arises if it is determined that the AI companies' actions have unfairly disrupted the market for human artists. This could lead to further legal complications and claims from affected artists. [18], [19]

Privacy concerns related to user data and compliance with regulations like GDPR and CCPA may arise if the AI companies are found to be mishandling user information in the process of generating music. [19]